Home Activism How To Respond To An Anti Conspiracy Theorist

How To Respond To An Anti Conspiracy Theorist

“You sound like a conspiracy theorist.”
RESPONSE: “Conspiracy Theorist? Now tell me the truth, where did you hear that term…on TV? (Laugh.) …So let me get this straight. Are you saying that men in high positions of power are not capable of criminal activity and telling lies to the general public? Are you really that naive?” (Laugh as you say this.)
“I’m not saying that governments don’t lie, but a conspiracy like that would have to involve 100′s of people. You can’t hide something like that.”
RESPONSE: “You’re absolutely right. I agree with you 100%. It is impossible to totally cover up a conspiracy so massive. That’s why I know about it! What you must understand is that they don’t have to cover it up totally. Even a bucket that has a few  leaks can still do the job of carrying water from here to there! They only need to fool 80% of the public, which isn’t hard to do when you control the major networks and newspapers. The 10-20% that do figure it out (and the fewer still who will dare to speak their minds about it) can be very easily marginalized with the propaganda label “conspiracy theorist.” The 80% +  never take us critical thinkers seriously because they want to be part of the majority. This is known as groupthink.(*Note: When saying “conspiracy theorist”, always hold your two hands up as you make sarcastic quote marks with your fingers.)  

(The Ridicule Trick) “That’s ridiculous (as he rolls his eyes). Do you really believe that nonsense?”
RESPONSE: “Can I ask you an honest question?” (Wait for “yes”) Do you consider yourself an open minded, critical thinking person – yes or no? (Wait for “yes”)  Then how can you possibly ridicule an opinion when you haven’t even done 10 minutes of research into the matter? That’s kind of ignorant don’t you think?” (Wait for response.)
. ”Not
“Not everything that happens in the world is a conspiracy!” 
RESPONSE: “Not everything is a conspiracy, but nor is NOTHING a conspiracy either. Wouldn’t you agree that we should evaluate each case independently and with an open mind?” (Wait for response.)
“Governments are so incompetant that they can’t even deliver the mail on time or balance a budget. They couldn’t conspire their way out of a paper bag!”.
RESPONSE: “Don’t confuse your incompetant, dim witted Congressman or Senator with the shadow government. The dark covert elements who stage these events are very skilled at carrying out, and concealing, their plots. Take for example the Manhattan Project. Hundreds of the world’s top scientists were holed up in a desert for months as they worked on the Atomic Bomb. This conspiracy was so secretive, that when FDR died and Vice President Truman became President, FDR’s advisors had to inform him of the Project’s existence! So you see, the shadowy intelligence element of the government is VERY capable!”
(The Unresolved Detail Trick) “If this is a conspiracy then explain to me how they managed to do x, y, and z?”
RESPONSE: “I don’t have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It’s the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) 
“So what? just because “x” happened, or “y” said this, it doesn’t mean it’s a conspiracy. You’re taking a few coincidences and making a conspiracy out of it. ”
RESPONSE: “If it were just one or two coincidences, I would agree with you. But when you have a series of 10,15, 20 different anomolies, the law of statistics PROVES that they can’t all be just “coincidence”. For example, if we’re playing dice, and I roll a “7″ to win. That doesn’t mean that my dice are rigged. It’s just a 1 in 6 coincidence. But if I roll a “7″, eight times in a row, then that’s a 1 in 150,000 “coincidence”. You would have to be a fool not to question the integrity of those dice! You do understand probabilities don’t you? (Wait for response.)
(The Isolated Piece of Evidence Trick) “Other than citing some historical events, you still haven’t shown me one piece of evidence that this was a conspiracy. Tell me just one thing that most proves a conspiracy.”

RESPONSE: “That’s a trick question! If I tell you “just one thing”, you’ll just climb on your high horse and dismiss it as a “coincidence”. What I want to show you is TWENTY THINGS! But you’re too closed minded to consider the case in its totality! You won’t even watch a You Tube video let alone read the case! I sure hope you never get selected to serve on a jury! You want everything boiled down to a simplistic media sound byte. Unless you will commit to a few hours of study, I’m wasting my time with you. Why are you so afraid to study this? (Wait for a response.)
“If this were true, the media would be all over it! It would be on the front page of every newspaper in America.”
RESPONSE: “The media, the government, the International bankers, Hollywood, and academia are all part of the same incestuous complex. The media is part of the conspiracy, so why would you expect them to tell you the truth?” (Wait for response.)
“You wouldn’t be able to corrupt so many people. Every reporter and politician would have to be “in on it” in order to cover it up.”
RESPONSE: “The corruption doesn’t come from the outside-in. It comes from the top-down. If the ownership of a major media organization decides that a certain story is to be spiked, or if another story is to be hyped, then the rest of the organization follows. If a low level reporter decides to defy his bosses, he will lose his job and be blacklisted. Remember Helen Thomas? After 50 years as a White House Correspondent, she was dumped like a hot potato for publicly criticizing Israel. The same fearful top-down control works in government and academia as well.
“This is crazy. I don’t believe in conspiracy theories.”
RESPONSE: “You don’t believe it? Or You don’t WANT to believe it? There’s a big difference between the two. The human mind is filled with complexes, one of which is the desire to shield itself from unpleasant truths. You’re afraid that if you look into this, you might see that it’s true. And you’re especially afraid that if you come to agree with me, you too will then become marginalized as a “conspiracy theorist.” It is FEAR that is causing you to close your mind and act like a sheep. Grow a pair and stop being so closed minded!
“Conspiracy theories appeal to uneducated people because they provide simplistic answers to complex events.”
RESPONSE: “Exactly the OPPOSITE is true! The evaluation of conspiracy theories not only requires much time and study, but also applied logic and critical thinking. It is intellectually lazy people like you who choose to swallow and parrot whatever simplistic narrative that the TV feeds you. Do you ever question anything that the TV feeds you?” (Wait for response.)
“Conspiracy theories appeal to people because they are comforting.”
RESPONSE: “Exactly the OPPOSITE is true. It is far more comforting to believe that certain tragic events happen exactly as the TV says, than to believe in monstrous internal plots beyond our control. Do you actually think that I enjoy believing that such evil exists? You think I like being ridiculed by simple minded family members and friends? Take it from me, the life of a “conspiracy theorist” can actually be quite stressful at times!”
“Don’t believe everything you read on the Internet.”
RESPONSE: “I don’t believe everything that’s on the Internet. But apparently you believe everything that’s on the TV! I only believe those things which are verifiable, and consistent with my own sense of reasoning and logic. The beauty of the Internet is that, unlike the TV that you worship so much, all sides of an issue are presented on the Internet. It allows a critical thinker to figure out what the true story is. The TV doesn’t give you that option. Do you really believe that the media presents the whole story? Are you that naive? (laugh) Remember the fairy tale of the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? The media shoved that lie down our throats. So why do you trust the media so blindly and not the Internet?”
(Wait for response.)
[Hat tip: Rense.com]



  1. Oh do I know some of these scenarios… Cool thing though this exercise helps me predict some that I have not yet lived.. As Always thanks for posting this Zen. Much Love.

  2. Fat Facts the naysayers cant debate.
    1 911Three buildings ..Two planes
    2..All Money is Debit owed and taxes are enslavement mechanization
    3.Governments Govern people Not help people.
    4 we have Allopathic medicine
    5 The Vatican is one of the richest country’s in the world .
    Those are simple talking points that always lead to a quick shut down when i am told I should be waring a tin foil hat . All of those topics all public knowledge and the people seam to understand them even if its only the smallest amounts.

    • Good ones. Educational system another. A really good lead in is with natural medicine vs. the crap the FDA approves. Most will agree. Then go to “why would the govt approve these dangerous drugs, pestiticides and the like, and condemn natural remedies and supplements, hmm?”

  3. I really love ur post zen so much thought provoking information all i can say is thank you for your service for the betterment of humanity, much love

  4. I loveitiloveitiloveit!

    Last election day I cornered all the locals running for office that we’re outside the voting areas. It was the most spectacular display of chemtrails that morning. I asked them all to look up and asked who, if elected, would help me find out what was being sprayed over our skies. After the usual “oh it’s contrails” followed by my 30 second rant about the difference between the two, I get the usual “oh are you a conspiracy theorist” har har har (these are local people I’ve know all my life.) My usual reply that Always shuts them up– No I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am on a quest for knowledge. Anyone on a quest for knowledge will explore ALL theories. I guess I’ll just move along. Thank you very much for your time.

  5. Show me the proof. Give me the truth. Simple as that.

    Otherwise, feel free to be nattering about chemtrails.

    • No, go get the proof. If you want the truth it’s out there. Stop asking to be spoon fed stuff you want to bat back for fun and profit. Ridiculous.

  6. Great ideas, however the masses [us too] have been conditioned to ONLY process what is on TV. The internet has no credibility to the closed , comfortable igloos of the masses. One has to ask the question and seek for ones self. Chemtrails is the thing that did it for me and may be a good place to mix reality with blindness. I was looking around on the web and found “Chemtrails”, this was 5 years ago. I read the info and looked out my door and shit!..there they were… eyes wide shut all these years. I was upset that something had been blinding me for 10 years!..IT was ME. I backtracked the first time I saw one [1997] and it looked like a low flying jet plane with a bad fuel leak or something…I said to myself,’If this is a bad thing it will be on the news”. Of course it wasn’t on the news and I never acknowledged their presence even though I saw them. Next were the X’s in the air a year later. Every city has a radio station that promoted X music.. I thought it was advertising. Even blanket spraying that I saw was discounted and converted to SMOG. The TV didn’t tell me about chemtrails , therefore they didn’t exist! Politics and world events can easily be fudged to a closed mind however the Chemtrails are right there. It is amazing how people you show them to just CANNOT SEE THEM! Breaking conditioning is not easy and must be initiated by the individual.. somehow. I like to tell people, “It’s OK, they’re spraying vitamins” , just to instill the idea of a “spray” as opposed to a “CON”….trail. Good Luck

  7. We don’t have to give a response to people who don’t see reality as it is. They are happy with their jobs and material needs, and even sometimes they don’t have time to research all of this and are better just going on with their lives. WE know what’s going on and therefore we have the responsibility to do something about it. I say let’s start with local congress. Have them tell you what have they done to help you. Interview them. Even if good and honest people rise to power we will let people like the ones I described above continue their lives as they are but without all the evil that our current ‘leaders’ are distilling.

  8. Huh… looks like my usual objection isn’t listed. Still in the interests of completeness.. “What difference does it make? If you’re wrong, then it doesn’t matter. If you’re right, and the ‘Bad Guys’ are a cross-cultural cabal with all the money and the power, and are masters of manipulating the public then they’ve already won and can’t be beaten. So what’s the actual difference in how we react? How is this information useful?”

Leave a Reply