Home Geoengineering Is It Really ...

Is It Really Getting Colder? What Does Scientifically Undisputed Data Say?

by -
14 324

Dane Wigington


The stakes could not be higher or our collective reality any more dire. This being the case, many are willing to lie about reality for a long list of reasons. Many others are all too quick to believe the lies without any objective investigation, especially if the lies are what they want to believe.

I want to make one point clear, my goal in pointing out specific facts, charts, and details is primarily to bring attention to the subject of global geoengineering. I am not saying geoengineering is the sole source for the climate chaos and atmospheric disintegration that is now unfolding around us, there are many causal factors, but I do believe data indicates geoengineering is the single greatest climate disrupting factor of all. (Not to mention poisoning all life on earth in the process).

When “global cooling” articles and conclusions are embraced by anti-geoengineering activists and web sites, without proper investigation, these activists and web sites are then completely discredited in many circles that are all too good at “throwing the baby out with the bathwater”. The subject of geoengineering goes out the window with the “climate change denial” that can not be rationally denied at this point if one truly examines hard data. If we are ever to bring geoengineering to the light of day, we can not afford such mis steps. It is imperative that we all make an effort to pull together, and not open up new battle fronts in directions that are not supported by verifiable information.

So, is it getting colder?

July 2013 was the 341st consecutive month of ABOVE AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. August will be the 342nd but has not yet been tabulated, that’s over 28 years of consecutive above average temperatures.



Is the Arctic ice cap really growing? No, it is steadily and rapidly shrinking, the current bombardment of spun math is this, the cap is 60% larger than last year, the lowest ice cover ever recorded. 2013 will still be at best the 4th LOWEST ice “extent” area ever recorded. “Extent” refers to the surface area alone, not the “ice mass” which I will cover below. The ice “mass” is by far the most telling factor of what is truly occurring in the Arctic.

Screen Shot 2013-09-06 at 8.39.21 PM


In regard to the Arctic ice “mass”, (total volume), it is at all time record lows and still declining. The mass has declined over 80% from the historical average.

Screen Shot 2013-09-07 at 10.46.03 AM


How about the ten warmest years on record, all in the last 15 years?


What about the 362 ”all time record highs in the US during 2012, ZERO record lows, ZERO. 2012 was also the hottest year ever recorded in the US


Another thing that is extremely important to consider, it appears that all the climate data/temperature records are being radically falsified to the down side. In the areas we have investigated it seems that the “official reading” for a given day is routinely 3, 4, or even 5 degrees below what actually occurred on the ground. This is a massive data skewing factor which helps to hide the true extent of the warming. In addition, “official agencies” like NOAA,(NOAA is connected to geoengineering contractor “Raytheon”), and National Weather Service ( NWS is connected to geoengineering contractor Lockheed Martin), etc, now appear to be logging many more temperature readings from a given “cold” event as compared to “heat wave” areas of the same land mass. This skews the data to the down side even further. On top of all this, lets add the “geoengineering” factor, artificial/chemical ice nucleation, jet stream manipulation, etc, which can and does create temporary cooling anomalies from which the agencies above take an abundance of temp readings in the attempt to lower the overall temperature picture.

Hope we will all take the time to consider the entire data picture before leaping at conclusions. None of this is about “Al Gore” or his scams, but rather its about a harsh and verifiable reality. Any conclusions must consider the massive data altering and even more the global geoengineering programs and their effects.




Dane has a background in solar energy. He is a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp. and was a licensed contractor in California and Arizona. He has been engaged in constant climate/geoengineering research for over a decade.His personal residence was feature in a cover article on the world’s largest renewable energy magazine, Home Power. He owns a 1,600-acre “wildlife preserve” next to Lake Shasta in northern California.Dane put all his focus, efforts and energy on the geoengineering issue when he began to lose very significant amounts of solar uptake due to what ever-increasing “solar obscuration” caused from the aircraft spraying. He also noted significant decline in forest health. Extensive testing and research into the geoengineering issue was commenced and has continued since 2002.He is the lead researcher for www.geoengineeringwatch.org and has investigated all levels of geo engineering from stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) to HAARP. He has appeared numerous films, and radio interviews to explain the environmental and health dangers we face on a global level from geoengineering.Dane lives in Shasta County, California.



  1. Getting warmer? Come to Britain. Three of the last four winters have been shockers. Even I at approaching 60 don’t recall temperatures so low in this country.
    And explain this one:
    “Foiled by Ice”

    Climate change is regarded as just a huge tax-raker, manipulated by governments to mean whatever they want it to mean, in accordance with the amount of money they want out of us. By the time data has been collected and then skewed by parties on both sides of the argument, the truth is very difficult to find.

    It doesn’t matter whether the damned planet is warming or cooling, governments are milking it like stink to rob us of our wealth. And of course it’s all the fault of those pesky humans, who should be exterminated by the millions in order to bring the planet back under control.

  2. Dane Wigington was looking like he was going to lead the charge on the effects of atmospheric spraying / poisoning and then took this major diversion (my opinion) into the global warming / cooling issue. He’s become much more didactic in the last couple of interviews I’ve listened to and I would suggest coming down off the pedestal and simply help connect the dots of this important issue.

  3. Sorry, its past time that I will ever believe any scientist and what they have to say. There’s too much disinfo and vested interests. They are simply not trustworthy. They could tell me that their crap is brown and I’d be sceptical now. This sounds like more muddying of the waters.

  4. oh this is must see


    “weatherman” hijacks airtime telling people about chemtrails and to LOOK UP

    btw… I’m only interested in articles with CHEMTRAILS — NOT geoengineering — in the headlines.


    there’s more than one kind of fungus among us. Take your NAC http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=NAC+for+fungal+infections&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

    it’s pretty obvious the heavy spraying ALWAYS precedes these wild storms — notice all the “flash flooding”?

Leave a Reply